It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
 
         
 
     
QuickLinks
  
Home of the Converged PDA - Phone    
 
Go Back  PDAPhoneHome.com > Pocket PC PDAPhones > Treo 700W / 700WX > Someone has their hands on it!!!

Reply
 
PDAPhoneHome  
 
Old 10-28-2005, 04:20 AM
     
  #21 (permalink)  
Registered User
crazyphil's Avatar
Join Date: 06-24-2003
Location: Southern California
PDAPhone: Treo 700w
Carrier: VzW
Posts: 731
 

Actually, even though I am looking forward to the camera on whichever device I end up buying I am more concerned about work use. I will be changing jobs soon and it would be a major bummer if my new "out of trial period" camera phone is now not allowed in my workplace due to security reasons.
__________________
Phil
 
crazyphil is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2005, 08:29 PM
     
  #22 (permalink)  
Moderator
Join Date: 04-16-2003
Location: New York
PDAPhone: Storm 9530
Carrier: Verizon/AT&T
Headset: Jawbone & Pioneer
Posts: 4,437
 

I really don't see all the hype on the cameras on the phones today. They are meant for quick simple pics and not high end photo's. I only get the camera phone versions for the resale end not the camera end.
__________________
My PDA & SmartPhone History: Palm Vx; M505;TungstenT; NX60; iPaq 1910; I700; Treo 600; hx4700; MPx220; hw6515, Treo 700w, XV6700,, Treo 700p, Moto Q Black, Moto Q9h, BlackBerry 8310 & BlackBerry 8820, BlackBerry Bold, BlackBerry Storm 9530.
 
ppcmd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 12:50 PM
     
  #23 (permalink)  
Moderator
EvilHomer's Avatar
Join Date: 08-07-2003
Location: Arlington, TX
PDAPhone: iPhone
Carrier: AT&T
Headset: Apple iPhone BT Headset
Posts: 1,871
  Send a message via ICQ to EvilHomer Send a message via MSN to EvilHomer

Quote:
Originally posted by ppcmd
I really don't see all the hype on the cameras on the phones today. They are meant for quick simple pics and not high end photo's. I only get the camera phone versions for the resale end not the camera end.
Agreed. I think the camera should be left as a little icing on the specs, not as a replacement for a read digital camera. They barely made a phone/pda converged device that runs well, let alone getting a professional quality camera into the package. I think people put FAR to great a point on the camera when the "focus" should be on the pda/voice intergration and stability. Frankly, I'm sick to death of hearing about disapointment in camera specs on phones that are geared to mobile data professionals, many of whom work in non-camera allowed areas.

Another thing to conisder is once you have combined a device with excellent pda/voice function, add an 8 megapixel camera with professional grade flash and lenses, you are going to have a deivce with a sticker price of $1500 bux. The I730 is a good example. $700 retail and no camera! Imagine putting $500 or more worth of camera into it. I'm sure people who are looking for a camera replacment would be happy to pay for it, but I don't need a camera and not willing to pay several hundred dollars more for a converged device with a high end camera.

Wanting a pda/phone combo makes sense because for professionals, they go hand in hand. I don't think the camera falls into that category. It's like complaining that the gaming is ok but not like as good as an XBox. You don't buy a smartphone for high end gaming so why expect high end photography? I am not saying it's not useful, or fun. I just don't believe it desevers the criticism that the pda/phone does. Focusing on the camera portion is no more important than the "gaming" for the business professional.
__________________
Ascii stupid question, get a stupid Ansi.
 
EvilHomer is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 02:56 AM
     
  #24 (permalink)  
Registered User
Join Date: 01-31-2004
Location: Richmond, Va
Posts: 225
 

The camera is nothing to right home about. I like the 6700 camera better, even though it may be the same hardware. I like the UI and software interface on the 6700. They are both manufactured by HTC with probably the same drivers, however, for the first time OEM and 3rd party developer's have access and can build there own camera Apps accessing the exposed WM 5 APIs.
 
existence is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2006, 08:10 AM
     
  #25 (permalink)  
Moderator
Join Date: 04-16-2003
Location: New York
PDAPhone: Storm 9530
Carrier: Verizon/AT&T
Headset: Jawbone & Pioneer
Posts: 4,437
 

Camera phones as a general rule suck. A few are very good, but most just suck. Thats why I don't buy a pdaphone for the camera.
__________________
My PDA & SmartPhone History: Palm Vx; M505;TungstenT; NX60; iPaq 1910; I700; Treo 600; hx4700; MPx220; hw6515, Treo 700w, XV6700,, Treo 700p, Moto Q Black, Moto Q9h, BlackBerry 8310 & BlackBerry 8820, BlackBerry Bold, BlackBerry Storm 9530.
 
ppcmd is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote

Reply


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Login Panel
Enter your username and password to login:


Advertisements



PDA and Smartphone Repair & Parts

Cellular Phone Parts and Accessories



PDAPhone Chargers and Screen Protectors

Where Photographers Meet

Please Help By Taking Our Survey!





Our Friends





All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 PM.

               
 
Design by VBSz   |  Hosting by PWH   |  
Copyright © 2002-2007, Convergent Minds, LLC - All Rights Reserved.