It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

 
 
         
 
     
QuickLinks
  
Home of the Converged PDA - Phone    
 
Go Back  PDAPhoneHome.com > PDAPhoneHome Content > PDAPhone News Archive > Smartphone News > Samsung Blackjack First Look

Comment
 
PDAPhoneHome  
 
Samsung Blackjack First Look
Samsung Blackjack First Look
Published by jpmihalk
12-03-2006
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Samsung Blackjack First Look

I have had the pleasure of evaluating several PDAphones in the past several years, and have recently had the opportunity to do a head-to-head comparison between the Motorola Q (on Verizon Wireless) and the Samsung Blackjack (on Cingular Wireless) and wanted to post some findings here.

First Impressions

My first thought upon opening the box at the Cingular store was "Wow! That's small!" In fact, I had my RAZR V3i in my pocket and I didn't think the Blackjack even weighed more than the RAZR (although reality is that the RAZR weighs in at 3.31 ounces and the Blackjack at 3.5 ounces.)


From left to right: RAZR V3i, Blackjack, Motorola Q, hw6940 iPAQ

I also had my Q back at my in-laws waiting for me. The Q weighs in at 4.1 ounces and is even heavier and bulkier with the extended battery, and actually felt much larger in my hand after holding the Blackjack. The Blackjack feels just as sleek, but it does have a bulge where the camera is installed at the top rear, in addition to the external speaker. Where the Blackjack seems to feel easier to handle and pocket is in the height and width, being narrower than the Q. It also seems to pocket easier, which is a good thing.



On left - Blackjack, on right - Q

Testing and Results

One of the benefits of the Blackjack is the new 3G HSDPA capability, which offers some serious speed for Cingular users (finally!) Where the Q has been out with EVDO for almost six months, true 3G has not been available for GSM users until just very recently. I tested the speeds using DSLreports.com/mspeed and found that the Q consistently downloaded at around 460Kbps in the Baltimore EVDO area. The Blackjack, however, totally exceeded expectations by consistently downloading at over 1Mbps (1026Kbps) in the same area. Unfortunately, not all cities have HSDPA and many won't see it for a while, including my home area of Norfolk/Virginia Beach, Virginia. But even the EDGE speeds seemed faster on the Blackjack than with comparable EDGE devices, like the HP hw6940 and Cingular 8125. Browsing is easy and supports many if not most web sites.

The Blackjack is a similar type of device as the Q - a Windows Mobile 5 smartphone, with the display in a 320x240 pixels landscape orientation standard. The processors are remarkably similar (TI OMAP 220MHz in the Blackjack) and the memory configurations are similar (128MB ROM, 64MB RAM) with the expansion slots being different. The Q uses mini-SD and the Blackjack uses micro-SD (so I now have to have a whole slew of different memory cards and it is yet another hidden expense.) The good news is that the micro-SD cards are available in 2GB sizes right in the Cingular store (with a $20 rebate when I got mine.)

The Blackjack has some noticeable differences in the button and keyboard arrangements. The Blackjack has the volume up/down rocker on the left top side of the device right above the charging/sync slot. On the right side, there is a thumbwheel with the back/escape button directly below, just as on the Q and RIM Blackberries with the micro-SD slot above. (Note the slots for sync and expansion cards are protected by attached rubber covers.) The QWERTY keyboard is also similar to the Q, with the keys angled slightly to facilitate typing, but there are additional buttons along the bottom row to help with Caps Shift, Num Lock, Symbol, and Mail. The standard Windows Mobile Smartphone buttons directly under the screen manage the Home Screen, Back/Escape and the soft buttons, with the Green Call Send and red Call End buttons on either side of the circular 5-way action button.

The screen is just slightly smaller than the Q overall, but is bright, sharp, and very readable.

The Blackjack comes with an additional battery and a separate charger unit in the box (as if to respond to the Q users and their battery issues.) The package also includes a proprietary USB synch cable and the usual manuals and CD. The box does not include a case nor a cradle.

Battery life seems to be much better than the Q, using a similar configuration, but I cannot conclude that it is until I have tested it further. Battery life does appear promising.

The major benefit is the apparent snappiness in performance.

Phone Operation

The Q was one of the best PDAphones as far as phone call clarity and quality in my usage. I liked my RAZR for call quality of service on Cingular. But my first use of the Blackjack sold me very quickly on it as a cell phone.

Call volume was very good, in fact one of the best for any PDAphone I have ever used or tested (over 40 to date.) The standard Windows Mobile tools such as Speed Dial and the phone app are somewhat dubious to me, but I have yet to experience any problems and Microsoft has made it easier than ever to save a number called or received. The speakerphone is very good, whether used on a table or just in the air like in a car. Signal strength is as good as any other Cingular device I have had, and is better then the 8125 or the hw6940. And, even more importantly, the Blackjack is comfortable to use by holding to to your head or with a bluetooth headset.

Bluetooth

The Blackjack uses the new Bluetooth 2.0 standard. Disappointingly, even though the Blackjack supports A2DP audio, it doesn't support standard audio over hands-free profile, so you can't use a normal phone headset for anything except phone calls. My Jabra JX10 paired right up and has worked perfectly since day one with clear audio quality. The only problem has been with automatic reconnection when I walk out of range - it disconnects and I manually have to reconnect through the Bluetooth menu. My A2DP Motorola HT820 headset also paired up and the Stereo Headset profile came right up on discovery and worked with the 250 or so music files I had stored on the micro-SD card using Windows Media Player.

The one major problem that I have found is that I can not seem to get the Blackjack to connect to ActiveSync over Bluetooth. Try as I might, I was unable to get the Blackjack to see the ActiveSync profile from either my desktop or my laptop. Apparently, the Serial Port profile isn't working, but is required on the PC end to be configured in ActiveSync for the Bluetooth COM port assigned. there are a number of users on the Cingular users forums experiencing the same problem and hopefully a fix is forthcoming.

Messaging

The Blackjack is designed for easy keyboarding and to be used with email and SMS messaging. SMS texting is straightforward, although the standard Microsoft app doesn't support threaded SMS or other more advanced features. The Blackjack has the Microsoft Messaging and Feature Pack (MSFP) and is ready for immediate use with Exchange 2003 mail servers. There is a wizard to get the new user started that walks through the process of connecting to Exchange.

For my testing, our company is using Novell GroupWise 7 with Service Pack 1. One of the new tools we have been evaluating with all PDAphones (except Blackberries, as we hope to reduce annual maintenance costs and license/connect fees with Blackberries) is the new GroupWise Mobile Server, powered by Intellisync. GroupWise Mobile provides an experience similar to Blackberry enterprise Server, connecting to the GroupWise post office and relaying mail in real-time to the device, using an installed client. There are clients for Smartphone and we have been testing with the Q and other PDAphones (Windows Mobile and Palm clients) with some success. The Q created a new mail account, but the Blackjack did not create a new account in Pocket Outlook, instead it requires the user to open the Inbox from the Intellisync client and not through the usual mail buttons or menus. This is a minor inconvenience, but not enough to deter its use. The other thing that may prevent users from using GW Mobile is that "push" email requires SMS messaging. (The server sends a specially formatted SMS to the client telling the device to connect and retrieve the waiting message.) Without a significant quantity SMS plan, this can get expensive very quickly.


Samsung Blackjack image courtesy of CrunchGear
Note the bulge at top in the side view

Conclusions

Overall, the Blackjack is a very affordable and effective solution. It suffers from the limitations of the Smartphone OS - no touch screen, and no Pocket Word, Excel or PowerPoint. However, for the user looking for a powerful and fast email or web device, the Blackjack is the perfect fit. For users living in the HSDPA-enabled data areas of Cingular coverage, it is the fastest device on the U.S. market in the Smartphone offerings. I really wish that Samsung or Cingular packaged the Blackjack with a micro-SD card (like they do with the Motorola V3i RAZR with iTunes.)

Every application that ran on the Q also runs on the Blackjack, including ALK CoPilot Q Edition (GPS Navigation app.)

Overall, I give it a good rating with the potential to be rated excellent after a few weeks of use and testing, in particular with the battery life and data speeds.
__________________
John

PDAPhoneHome Forum Moderator
Latest 5 articles



Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #1 (permalink)  
By colordiva on 12-06-2006, 01:08 AM
Thank you for the review. I did a speed test in the store and was stunned to get 920 kbps. Tried it side by side with my Samsung i730 EV-DO and got a lousy 600. I almost switched carriers there on the spot! If it was PPC and not smartphone I would have. I'm still tempted and am doing some serious soul searching about what I really use my device for. Not sure I could get used to not having the touch screen. I found myself touching the Blackjack screen quite a bit in the few minutes I had with it!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
By ChrisSpera on 12-06-2006, 05:47 PM
Thanks for the review, John. I appreciate it. I am tettering back and forth with tis. I have a HP 6515, want a 6945/25 (but don't want to spend $600), and am looking at the Blackjack as an alternative. I'm not too crazy about Smartphone OS, though.

I may wait to see if any of the new imate devices are worth while... I'm not certain. I've got that new PDA Phone itch...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
By jpmihalk on 12-06-2006, 06:12 PM
Chris,

The Smartphone OS can drive you crazy if you are used to using the Pocket PC touch screen interface. The big selling points of the 6900's are WM5 and WiFi, plus the full Pocket Office suite. Depending on where you live, you may only get EDGE as your best data speed anyway, so that may be a wash for you.

I need a solid cell phone first, so that is why I really like the Blackjack. It has been a solid performer for me.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
By blue2noise on 12-09-2006, 10:37 PM
I just bought a BlackJack based on your review and love it so far. What program are you using to modify the today screen? i see you have small icons at the top instead of the large ones. I would like to pick which programs show up on the top and make the icons smaller like your screen shot. How can i do this?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
By jpmihalk on 12-10-2006, 08:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue2noise
I just bought a BlackJack based on your review and love it so far. What program are you using to modify the today screen? i see you have small icons at the top instead of the large ones. I would like to pick which programs show up on the top and make the icons smaller like your screen shot. How can i do this?
I'm not actually using any programs to modify the home screen, they are simply edited XML files. The list of icons at the top is called the MRU (Most Recently Used) list and it is not editable other than to use large or small icons. My understanding is that there are some other plugins like Facade that will allow you to choose what items you want to include on the Today screen. I prefer to keep it simple, yet smart.

You can check in the Q forum for some ideas, as they have been doing this for about 6 months now and have some good suggestions.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
By colordiva on 12-12-2006, 12:16 PM
Have you compared the 8525 to the Blackjack? I have read that the Blackjack is the fastest device available and wondered why it was faster than the 8525. Oh, Wise One, can you tell me?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
By jpmihalk on 12-12-2006, 02:43 PM
I have seen the 8525 and although I haven't tested it side by side with the Blackjack, I would imagine it is very similar in speeds. The Blackjack is different in that it is using a scaled-down version of the OS (without the touch screen) and so probably seems faster compared to the fully-loaded 8525. The 8525 has a faster processor, but may have more memory occupied and therefore appears slower than just its clock speed to the average user. I don't think you could go wrong with either.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
By ChrisSpera on 12-12-2006, 03:52 PM
I agree. There are 2 things that are keeping me from jumping on this device: The OS (I prefer a touch screen and the options it brings) and the lack of integrated GPS.

My 6515 is great, but the OS is dead and has gone as far as it is going to go. the 6900 is great, but HP isn't likely to upgrade it to Crossbow; so that device has reached the end of its lifecycle too. What I want is a device with the 65/6900 form factor and components, with the most recent OS. I think I need to wait, or just go with the 6900...

Opinions..? Anyone? Anyone..?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
By jpmihalk on 12-12-2006, 04:04 PM
Chris, I have an hw6940 (my wife is currently using it) and I have to say that with WM5 and WiFi, it is what the 6500 should have been all along.

To me, the integrated GPS is nice, but not needed, as there are plenty of alternatives in bluetooth GPS mice, and lots of apps to choose from. The 6900 is also larger than the 8100/8500 and the various Cingular Smartphones, so that is also a con.

So, if you like your 6500, go for the 6900, as it will feel familiar to you and may even feel like it was "fixed" from the WM2003 version. That's how I felt about it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
By revelstone77 on 12-22-2006, 10:22 PM
blackjack and microSD

since it was brought up (kind of) is anybody using a MicroSD card with the blackjack? I read at Samsung in their FAQ that the largest they recommend is 512MB although it will support a 1GB card. They said anything over 512 causes performance problems. I really would like to put a larger card in but don't want any problems either.

Hal
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
By jpmihalk on 12-23-2006, 08:49 AM
I have a 2GB MicroSD card in mine with as many apps on it as I can install, GPS maps and music. No performance issues whatsoever.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
By revelstone77 on 12-23-2006, 07:25 PM
Thanks, that's what i wanted to hear. I can pick up a 2GB card for about $63. I've had the Blackjack for about a week now and so far so good. A lot better than the 2125 i had before. The 3G network is a lot faster than the old Edge.

Hal
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
By revelstone77 on 12-27-2006, 12:02 PM
Ok, here is another one for you. If I buy a bluetooth stereo headset, such as the Moto Ht 820, can I listen to MP3's? I wasn't sure about the answer after reading your review.

Hal
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
By jpmihalk on 12-27-2006, 01:44 PM
Yes, you can listen to MP3's and WMA's over the HT820 (I have a set and they work well.)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
By ChrisSpera on 12-27-2006, 03:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jpmihalk
...So, if you like your 6500, go for the 6900, as it will feel familiar to you and may even feel like it was "fixed" from the WM2003 version. That's how I felt about it.
Yep... The 6900 arrives no later than Friday 12/29... Thanks, dude!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
By revelstone77 on 12-27-2006, 04:03 PM
John, thanks a bunch for all the info. It is greatly appreciated!

Hal
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
By jpmihalk on 12-27-2006, 04:26 PM
You're welcome!

I will post a one month follow up on the Blackjack soon with many more details.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
By ChrisSpera on 12-27-2006, 05:13 PM
That will be one I'll be looking for. I'm still sorta interested in the device... even tho I KNOW I shouldn't be.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19 (permalink)  
By jpmihalk on 12-27-2006, 08:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisSpera
That will be one I'll be looking for. I'm still sorta interested in the device... even tho I KNOW I shouldn't be.
LOL, Chris! I think you will find it is not for everyone, but it is an excellent alternative for many.