07-14-2006, 09:38 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: 04-14-2004
|
|
Location: IN
|
|
PDAPhone: Saga
|
|
Carrier: Verizon
|
Donate to Member
| Posts:
83 |
 |
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by crankyfranky00
I see the 2-year contract requirement. But why do people pay $400+ for a 6700 w/no contract requirement? They can't use the unit on any network other than Sprint's. This isn't a disposable phone either, so I think it fair to assume that people will want to use it as a phone -- and not just as a PocketPC -- for a few years. So what's the rationale for paying $400 to "dodge" a 2-year contract, when you'll end up paying for 2 year's worth of service anyway? If you buy a PPC-6700, you're buying Sprint too.
Apologies if I'm denser than usual, but this is bothering me. Thanks.
|
People who are in the middle of a contract and want a 6700.
|
|
|
|
|