02-06-2006, 11:21 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: 11-16-2002
|
|
Location: NY
|
|
PDAPhone: iPhone 3G
|
|
Carrier: AT&T
|
|
Headset: None Currently
|
Donate to Member
| Posts:
9,423 |
 |
|
Yes, lower priced L lenses would be good, but they do seem to be a "get what you pay for" proposition. My L's include a pair of 17-40 f/4s, a pair of 24-70 f/2.8s, 70-200 f/2.8 IS, 135 f/2, 200 f/1.8, and a 400 f/2.8. Those last two carried a hefty price tag.
__________________
Mike - Been Converged?
|
|
|
|
|